Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Acting (2014): the AAO concurred with the director's finding that the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the AAO concurred with the director's finding that the petitioner had not submitted qualifying evidence under at least three of the ten regulatory categories. The AAO concluded that the petitioner failed to satisfy the antecedent regulatory requirement, and therefore, did not establish the sustained national or international acclaim necessary for the classification.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Major Internationally Recognized Award 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(H)(3)(Iv) 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(H)(3)(Vi) 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(H)(3)(Vii) 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(H)(3)(X) Comparable Evidence
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.