EB-1A Dismissed — Acting (2006): did not establish sufficient evidence to meet the claimed
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence to meet the claimed criteria. The petitioner did not submit corroborating evidence for awards, failed to demonstrate that his membership in the Screen Actors Guild required outstanding achievement, and provided articles without required English translations or from publications not proven to be major media. Furthermore, evidence of original contributions was not probative as it also lacked required translations and was unsupported by documentation demonstrating major significance.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.