EB-1A Dismissed โ Agricultural And Natural Resource Management (2014): did not meet the minimum regulatory requirement of
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the minimum regulatory requirement of providing qualifying evidence under at least three criteria. The AAO conducted a de novo review and found the evidence submitted for the 'judging' criterion was insufficient, as it consisted of a personal statement, photographs without source, and an untranslated article, which did not prove formal participation as a judge. Since the petitioner did not satisfy the initial evidentiary requirements, the appeal could not be sustained.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.