dismissed EB-1A Case: Alternative Medicine

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave.. N.W., Rm. A3042 
Wash~ngton, DC 20529 
ldentiPVtng data deleled io U. S. Citizenship 
pm d-Iy unwammted and Immigration 
inwmdon of ~mm~l advaq Services 
PUBLIC COPY 
FILE: Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: (IOV 0 3 2005 
EAC 04 060 52 184 
IN RE: Petitioner: 
Beneficiary: 
PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Pursuant to Section 
203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 9 1153(b)(l)(A) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
SELF-REPRESENTED 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
Robert P. Wiemann, Director s .. . 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, Vermont 
Service Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be 
summarily dismissed. 
The petitioner seeks classification as an employment-based immigrant pursuant to section 203(b)(l)(A) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. ij 1153(b)(l)(A), as an alien of extraordinary ability. 
The director determined the petitioner had not established the sustained national or international acclaim 
necessary to qualify for classification as an alien of extraordinary ability. 
On appeal, the petitioner states: "I am real 
-!- 
n help people get the better life and improve 
their health [sic] Alternative Medicine as a good future.'. 
The appellate submission was unaccompanied by arguments or evidence addressing the pertinent regulatory 
criteria at 8 C.F.R. ij 204.5(h)(3).' 
As stated in 8 C.F.R. 3 103.3(a)(l)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned fails to 
identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
The petitioner has not specifically addressed the reasons stated for denial and has not provided any additional 
evidence. The appeal must therefore be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. 
I The petitioner indicated that he was submitting a separate brief and/or evidence with his Form I-290B, Notice of 
Appeal to the AAO, but the appellate submission included no additional documentation.