EB-1A Dismissed โ Architecture (2021): did not establish she met the minimum of three required
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that she met the minimum of three required evidentiary criteria for the extraordinary ability classification. The Director and the AAO concluded she only met one criterion (authorship of scholarly articles). Evidence for other claimed criteria, such as prizes and judging, was found insufficient as the awards were given to her employers, not her directly, and her judging role pertained to professional qualifications rather than the work of others.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.