EB-1A Dismissed โ Art (2017): did not meet at least three of the required evidentiary
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet at least three of the required evidentiary criteria. The AAO affirmed the Director's denial, finding that while the petitioner met the 'published material' criterion, the evidence did not establish 'original contributions of major significance.' The submitted reference letters were deemed insufficient as they described the petitioner's work as important without demonstrating how it had a significant impact or influence on the field as a whole.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.