Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Art (2020): the motion to reopen was dismissed because the petitioner
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen was dismissed because the petitioner failed to submit sufficient new evidence. The new evidence, a book excerpt, was deemed insufficient to demonstrate that the petitioner's artistic contributions were of major significance or influence in the field, and thus did not overcome the prior adverse decision.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Major Internationally-Recognized Awards Published Material About The Alien Display Of The Alien'S Work At Artistic Exhibitions Or Showcases Original Contributions Of Major Significance
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.