EB-1A Dismissed โ Art Restoration (2003): did not establish eligibility by meeting at least three of
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish eligibility by meeting at least three of the required regulatory criteria. The AAO found the evidence for a 1986 award was too dated to demonstrate sustained acclaim and its significance was not proven. Furthermore, a professional license was deemed insufficient for the membership criterion, published material was also from 1986 and not primarily about the petitioner, and claims of original contributions were not adequately substantiated.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.