dismissed EB-1A Case: Arts

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rm. 3000 
Wash~ngton, DC 20529 
PUBLIC COPY 
 @ U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
sG~d Services 
identifying data deleted to 
prevent clear1 y j~i~ v~arranted 
invasion of personal privacy 
r 
FILE: Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: OCT 2 4 2007 
WAC 06 007 52530 
IN RE: 
PETITION: 
 Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Pursuant to Section 
203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(l)(A) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
A ee obert P. Wiernann, Chief 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, Texas Service 
Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be summarily 
dismissed. 
The petitioner seeks classification as an employment-based immigrant pursuant to section 203(b)(l)(A) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. $ 1153(b)(l)(A), as an alien of extraordinary ability in 
the arts. The director determined the petitioner had not established the sustained national or international acclaim 
necessary to qualify for classification as an alien of extraordinary ability. 
On appeal, counsel states: 
The petitioner . . . does not agree [with] the Notice of Decision dated September 28, 2006 from 
USCIS Texas Service Center. [The petitioner] believes that he has submitted sufficient specific 
evidence to demonstrate that he should be granted Form 1-140 petition [sic] for immigration under the 
category of extraordinary ability. 
The petitioner's appeal was filed on October 24, 2006. The appellate submission was unaccompanied by 
arguments or evidence addressing the pertinent regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. 5 204.5(h)(3). On the Form I- 
290B, Notice of Appeal to the AAO, counsel checked the box indicating that the petitioner was "not 
submitting a separate brief or evidence." 
As stated in 8 C.F.R. $ 103.3(a)(l)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned fails to 
identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
The petitioner has not specifically addressed the reasons stated for denial and has not provided any additional 
evidence. The appeal must therefore be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.