dismissed EB-1A Case: Arts

identifyingdatadeletedto
prevent clearly unwarrllltld
invasion-ofpcIIO-J*ivac"
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rm. 3000
Washington, DC 20529
u.s.Citizenship
and Immigration
Services
PUBLICCOpy
FILE:
SRC 07 800 00856
Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: fEB 20 2008
INRE: Petitioner:
Beneficiary:
PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Pursuant to Section
203(b)(l)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(l)(A)
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:
INSTRUCTIONS:
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office.
1RO~~~
Administrative Appeals Office
www.uscis.gov
DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, Texas Service
Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be summarily
dismissed.
The petitioner seeks classification as an employment-based immigrant pursuant to section 203(b)(l)(A) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(l)(A), as an alien of extraordinary ability in
the arts. The director determined the petitioner had not established the sustained national or international acclaim
necessary to qualifYfor classification as an alien of extraordinary ability.
On appeal, counsel states: "The adjudicating officer incorrectly valued the evidence and information
submitted."
The appellate submission was unaccompanied by arguments or evidence addressing the pertinent regulatory
criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3).
Counsel indicated that a brief and/or evidence would be submitted to the AAO within 30 days. The appeal was
filed on January 25,2007. As of this date, more than one year later, the AAO has received nothing further.
As stated in 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned fails to
identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal.
The petitioner has not specifically addressed the reasons stated for denial and has not provided any additional
evidence. The appeal must therefore be summarily dismissed.
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.