dismissed EB-1A Case: Arts

U.S. Depsnrtmcnl oEHom@Banc% Security 
20 Mass. Ave.. N W., Rm A3042 
Wash~ngton, DC 20529 
'U* S. Citizenship 
md Immigration 
Services 
cu e- 
$** ilak4&>*"h,#z , 8 Y 
d* %L4&&rp*** 
FILE: Office: CALEOWM SERVICE CENTER Date: pFr ; ':C 708: 
\i -d 
170 
\ 
PETITION: Smmgant Petlbon for Alien Worker as an Allen of Extraordinary Ab~Bity Pwsuant to 
Sect~on 203(b)(B)(A) of the Hmmlgra'e~oa and Natnonality Act, 8 U.S.C, 8 71 153(b)(l)(A) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
R 
TEIS 1s the decision of the Admir.strat:ve Appeals Office in your case. A11 documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further mqunry must be made to that office. 
?\ q\ 
b L2L%JL 43 \d!Liua Yb&+# 
1 
&/Robefl P. Waemann, D~rector 
&'' Admm~s~arnve Appeals Office 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director. California Service 
Center, and is now before the Adaninistrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed. 
The petitioner seeks cBassification as an employment-based immigrant pursuant to section 203(b)(I)(A) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. # 1 153(b)(l)(A), as an alien of extraordinary ability gin the 
a~s. The director determined that the petitioner had not established the sustained national or international 
acclaim requisite to classiGcatEon as an alien of extraordinary ability. 
On Form I-290B counsel states, ' as submitted sufficient documentation to meet the standards sf 
an alien of extraordinary ability. . Counsel submits no brief or additional evidence on appeal. 
Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 5 103.3(a)(l)(v), an appeal shall be summarPIy dismissed if the party concerned fails to 
identify specifically any erroneous concBusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. Counsel here identifies 
no errors of law or fact made in the disector's decision. The appeai must therefore be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.