dismissed EB-1A

dismissed EB-1A Case: Arts

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Individual ๐Ÿ“‚ Arts

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed on procedural grounds. The petitioner failed to submit a brief or statement that specifically identified an erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the original decision, as required by regulation.

Criteria Discussed

Failure To Identify Specific Error In Appeal

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
.
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF J-K-
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: MAY 24,2017 
APPEAL OF NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
PETITION: FORM 
I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR 
ALIEN WORKER 
The Petitioner, who describes himself as an seeks 
classification as an individual of extraordinary ability in the arts. See Immigration and Nationality 
Act section 203(b)(1)(A), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(1)(A). This first preference classification makes 
immigrant visas available to those who can demonstrate their extraordinary ability through sustained 
national or international acclaim and whose achievements have been recognized in their field 
through extensive documentation. 
The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition. The matter is now before us on 
appeal. Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. 
An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned 
fails to identify specifically an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). 
The Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically identifies an 
erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the decision being appealed. On the Form I-290B, Notice of 
Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted within 
30 days of the February 1, 2016, filing date. However, we have not received anything further from 
the Petitioner to date. Because the Petitioner has not identified a specific, erroneous conclusion of 
law or statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). 
Cite as Matter of J-K-, ID# 307244 (AAO May 24, 2017) 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.