EB-1A Dismissed โ Arts (2012): did not establish the sustained national or international
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish the sustained national or international acclaim required for classification as an alien of extraordinary ability. The AAO affirmed that merely submitting evidence for three of the ten regulatory criteria is insufficient. Under the two-part analysis established in Kazarian v. USCIS, the evidence in its totality must be considered in a final merits determination, and the petitioner's evidence did not demonstrate that they had risen to the very top of their field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.