EB-1A Dismissed โ Arts (2012): did not establish extraordinary ability or submitted
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the director determined the petitioner had not established the requisite extraordinary ability or submitted extensive documentation of sustained national or international acclaim. The AAO upheld this decision, finding that the evidence submitted, such as acceptance into an artist-in-residence program, did not meet the criteria for a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award. The petitioner failed to submit qualifying evidence under at least three of the ten regulatory categories.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.