Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Arts (2011): the petitioner failed to specifically identify any
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's decision, as required by regulation. Although counsel promised to submit a detailed brief, no additional information or arguments were provided to the AAO for over fifteen months, providing no basis to overturn the denial.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
8 C.F.R. § 204.5(H)(3) Criterion I (Prizes/Awards) Criterion Iv (Judging Others) Criterion Vii (Exhibitions/Showcases) Criterion X (Commercial Successes)
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.