dismissed
EB-1A
dismissed EB-1A Case: Arts
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusions of law or fact in the director's decision. The petitioner did not address the reasons for the denial or provide additional evidence, leading to a summary dismissal.
Criteria Discussed
Not specified
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S.Departmentof HomelandSecurity U.S.CitizenshipandImmigrationServices AdministrativeAppealsOffice(AAO) 20 MassachusettsAve.,N.W., MS 2090 del d to Washington,DC 20529-2090 identifyingdata ete U.S.Citizenship preventclearlyunwarranted andImmigration invasionofpersonalprivacy Services PUBLICCOPY 2- DATE: OCT 0 7 201] Office: TEXASSERVICECENTER FILE: IN RE: Petitioner: Beneficiary: PETITION: ImmigrantPetitionfor AlienWorkerasanAlienof ExtraordinaryAbility Pursuantto Section 203(b)(1)(A)of theImmigrationandNationalityAct, 8U.S.C.§ 1153(b)(1)(A) ONBEHALFOFPETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: Enclosedpleasefind thedecisionof theAdministrativeAppealsOffice in yourcase.All of thedocuments relatedto thismatterhavebeenreturnedtotheofficethatoriginallydecidedyourcase.Pleasebeadvisedthat anyfurtherinquirythatyoumighthaveconcerningyourcasemustbemadetothatoffice. If you believethelaw wasinappropriatelyappliedby us in reachingour decision,or you haveadditional informationthatyouwishtohaveconsidered,youmayfile amotiontoreconsideror amotiontoreopen.The specificrequirementsfor filing sucha requestcanbe foundat 8 C.F.R.§ 103.5. All motionsmustbe submittedtotheofficethatoriginallydecidedyourcaseby filing aFormI-290B,Noticeof AppealorMotion, with a feeof $630. Pleasebe awarethat 8 C,F.R.§ 103.5(a)(1)(i)requiresthatanymotionmustbe filed within30daysof thedecisionthatthemotionseekstoreconsiderorreopen. Thankyou, PerryRhew Chief,AdministrativeAppealsOffice www.uscis.gov DISCUSSION: Theemployment-basedimmigrantvisapetitionwasdeniedby the Director, Texas ServiceCenter,andis nowbeforetheAdministrativeAppealsOffice on appeal.Theappealwill be dismissed. Thepetitionerseeksclassificationasan"alienof extraordinaryability" in thearts,pursuantto section 203(b)(1)(A)of theimmigrationandNationalityAct (theAct), 8 U.S.C.§ 1153(b)(1)(A).Thedirector determinedthepetitionerhadnotestablishedthesustainednationalor intemationalacclaimnecessaryto qualifyfor theclassification. Onappeal,thepetitionermerelystatesthatto qualifyfor thisclassification,hemustmeetthreeof ten regulatorycriteriaandthatin hisinitial filing, hesubmittedevidenceunderfourregulatorycriteria.The petitioneralsoidentifieseachof thecriteriafor whichhesubmittedevidence.Thedirectoraddressed eachof thesecriteriain hisdecision. As statedin 8 C.F.R.§ 103.3(a)(1)(v),anappealshallbe summarilydismissedif thepartyconcerned failstoidentifyspecificallyanyerroneousconclusionof lawor statementof factfor theappeal. Thepetitionerhasnot specificallyaddressedthe reasonsstatedfor denialandhasnot providedany additionalevidence.Theappealmustthereforebesummarilydismissed. ORDER: Theappealis summarilydismissed.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.