dismissed EB-1A Case: Athletics
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate the requisite sustained national or international acclaim. The AAO conducted a de novo review and found that the beneficiary's accomplishments as a junior and collegiate tennis player were not sufficient to establish acclaim at the very top of the field, and there was no evidence of significant achievements as a professional player or as a high-level coach.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft guides you through USCIS criteria so your draft is organized around the right evidence, legal framing, and common denial patterns.
Start a Stronger Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.