EB-1A Dismissed โ Athletics (2016): did not establish eligibility under the required number of
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner, a table tennis player, failed to demonstrate eligibility under the required number of criteria. The AAO determined that the petitioner's U.S. Open award did not qualify as a 'one-time achievement' (a major, internationally recognized award), as there was insufficient evidence to prove it was a top award in the field with global recognition on par with an Olympic Medal. The petitioner did not establish that he met at least three of the evidentiary criteria.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.