EB-1A Dismissed โ Athletics (2018): did not establish he met at least three of the ten
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner did not demonstrate that he met at least three of the ten regulatory criteria for extraordinary ability. Although the AAO found that he met the criteria for lesser awards and membership in select teams, it concluded his medals did not qualify as a major, internationally-recognized 'one-time achievement' and his evidence for 'published material' was deficient. Therefore, having met only two criteria, the petition was ultimately denied.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.