Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Athletics (2022): the motion to reopen was dismissed because the petitioner
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the procedural requirements for a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, as established in Matter of Lozada. Furthermore, the new evidence submitted (an award) was not considered because it was obtained after the original petition was filed, and eligibility must be established at the time of filing.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Eligibility At The Time Of Filing
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.