EB-1A Dismissed โ Bioanalytical Chemistry And Neuroscience (2005): did not establish she met the regulatory criteria for an
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that she met the regulatory criteria for an alien of extraordinary ability. The AAO determined that the petitioner's academic scholarships, fellowships, and travel awards did not constitute nationally or internationally recognized prizes for excellence, but rather were part of her training and career progression. The evidence submitted for other awards was deemed insufficient to establish their significance or selection criteria.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.