Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Biochemistry (2022): the motion to reopen was dismissed because the petitioner
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen was dismissed because the petitioner largely submitted previously reviewed evidence, which is not permissible for such a motion. The new evidence provided was deemed insufficient to meet the criteria for awards, published material about the petitioner, or original contributions of major significance, leaving the petitioner with only two satisfied criteria instead of the required minimum of three.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Lesser Nationally Or Internationally Recognized Prizes Or Awards Published Material About The Alien Original Scientific Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Judging The Work Of Others
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.