EB-1A Dismissed โ Biological Sciences: did not establish the sustained national or international
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate the sustained national or international acclaim required for an alien of extraordinary ability. The director determined that the petitioner did not provide evidence of a major, internationally-recognized award, nor did she meet at least three of the ten regulatory criteria. The AAO upheld this decision, concurring that the submitted evidence, such as fellowships and poster awards, was insufficient to establish that the petitioner had risen to the very top of her field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.