EB-1A Dismissed โ Biomedical Research (2008): did not meet the minimum of three regulatory criteria
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the minimum of three regulatory criteria. Although the AAO concurred that the petitioner demonstrated original contributions of major significance and also met the scholarly articles criterion, it found the evidence for awards and memberships insufficient. The petitioner's travel grants and research funding were not considered nationally recognized awards for excellence, and his professional memberships did not require outstanding achievements for entry.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.