EB-1A Dismissed โ Biomedical Sciences (2021): did not establish they met at least three of the required
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that they met at least three of the required evidentiary criteria. While the petitioner met the criteria for authorship of scholarly articles and judging the work of others, the AAO determined that citations to his work did not qualify as published material 'about' him. Additionally, the evidence provided was insufficient to establish that his original contributions were of major significance to his field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.