EB-1A Dismissed โ Biotechnology (2016): did not meet number of evidentiary criteria
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the required number of evidentiary criteria. The AAO determined that an award submitted was given to the petitioner's employer, not the petitioner himself, and lacked evidence of national or international recognition. While the judging criterion was met, the evidence for original contributions of major significance did not establish widespread utilization or impact rising to the level of major significance in the field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.