dismissed EB-1A Case: Business

o . U.S. Citizenship 
"' and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF Y-F- INC. 
APPEAL OF TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: APR. 15, 2016 
PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FORALIEN WORKER 
The Petitioner, a food manufacturing company, seeks to classify the Beneficiary as an "alien of 
extraordinary ability" in business. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) § 203(b)(1)(A), 
8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(1)(A). This classification makes visas available to foreign nationals who can 
demonstrate their extraordinary ability through sustained national or international acclaim and whose 
achievements have been recognized iri their field through extensive documentation. 
The Director, Texas Service Center, denied the petition. The Director concluded that the Petitioner 
had not provided documentation for the Beneficiary satisfying the initial evidence requirements set 
forth at 8 C.F.R § 204.5(h)(3), which requires documentation of a one-time achievement or evidence 
that meets at least three of the ten regulatory criteria. The matter is now before us on appeal. The 
appeal will be summarily dismissed. 
The Petitioner filed the Notice of Appeal or Motion, Form I-290B, without any supporting evidence 
relating to the Beneficiary's eligibility for the classification sought. In Part 3 of the Form I-290B, 
the Petitioner checked box "l.b." indicating "[m]y brief and/or additional evidence will be submitted 
to the AAO within 30 calendar days of filing the appeal." Part 4 of the Form I-290B instructs the 
petitioner to "[p ]rovide a statement that specifically identifies an erroneous conclusion of law or fact 
in the decision being appealed," but the Petitioner did not include any such statement. The appeal 
was filed on January 4, 2016. As of this date, more than three months later, we have received 
nothing further. 
The Petitioner's appeal does not identify any erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the Director's 
decision. It does not specifically challenge any of the Director's findings or point to specific errors 
in the Director's determination that the Beneficiary had not satisfied the evidentiary requirements set 
forth at 8 C.F.R § 204.5(h)(3). 
As stated in 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned 
fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. The 
Petitioner has not specifically addressed the reasons stated for denial and has not provided any 
evidence pertaining to the Beneficiary's eligibility for the classification sought. We must therefore 
summarily dismiss the appeal. 
Matter ofY-F- Inc. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v). 
Cite as Matter of Y-F- Inc.; ID# 17397 (AAO Apr. 15, 20 16) 
2