EB-1A Dismissed โ Cancer Biology (2020): the petitioner ultimately did not meet the required three
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner ultimately did not meet the required three evidentiary criteria. Although the Service Center Director found she met three criteria, the AAO disagreed, finding she only met two (judging and authorship). The AAO concluded that the petitioner's evidence for 'original contributions of major significance' was insufficient, as her citation counts were not high enough and the expert letters lacked specific evidence of her work's widespread impact.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.