EB-1A Dismissed โ Cardiology (2017): did not establish eligibility for a third required
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish eligibility for a third required evidentiary criterion. While the Director found the petitioner met the criteria for judging the work of others and for authorship of scholarly articles, the AAO determined he did not sufficiently demonstrate that his work constituted original scientific contributions of major significance to the field, as the evidence did not show his impact rose to the level of major significance.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.