EB-1A Dismissed โ Ceramics (2005): the evidence submitted to meet the regulatory criteria was
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the evidence submitted to meet the regulatory criteria was found to be deficient and unreliable. The award certificates presented contained numerous misspellings, grammatical errors, and missing signatures, and lacked proof of national or international recognition. Similarly, the petitioner failed to provide contemporaneous evidence, such as event programs, to demonstrate her work was displayed at any specific artistic exhibitions or showcases.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.