EB-1A Dismissed โ Chemical Sciences: did not establish sustained national or international
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim. The evidence presented did not meet the regulatory criteria, specifically regarding prizes or awards. The AAO determined that the petitioner's associate professor position was a job, his patent was a property right, and his fellowships were designed to promote future research for young scientists, none of which constituted a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award for excellence.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.