EB-1A Dismissed โ Chess (2014): did not establish the sustained national or international
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the director determined the petitioner had not established the sustained national or international acclaim necessary for the classification. The AAO agreed, finding the petitioner failed to submit qualifying evidence under at least three of the ten regulatory criteria. The petitioner's arguments regarding his Grandmaster title as a one-time achievement, lesser awards, memberships, and original contributions were insufficient to meet the high standard for an alien of extraordinary ability.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.