Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Colloid Science: did not establish sustained national or international
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim. For the 'judging' criterion, the petitioner provided no documentary evidence of his peer review activities, and the AAO noted that routine peer review is not sufficient evidence of acclaim. For the 'original contributions' criterion, the director concluded that the petitioner had not established an impact of major significance in the field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.