dismissed
EB-1A
dismissed EB-1A Case: Colloid Science
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim. For the 'judging' criterion, the petitioner provided no documentary evidence of his peer review activities, and the AAO noted that routine peer review is not sufficient evidence of acclaim. For the 'original contributions' criterion, the director concluded that the petitioner had not established an impact of major significance in the field.
Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Original Contributions Of Major Significance
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft guides you through USCIS criteria so your draft is organized around the right evidence, legal framing, and common denial patterns.
Start a Stronger Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.