EB-1A Dismissed โ Computational Fluid Dynamics (2016): did not meet minimum of three regulatory criteria
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the required minimum of three regulatory criteria. While the Director found the petitioner satisfied the criteria for scholarly articles and a leading/critical role, the AAO determined he did not meet the criteria for membership in associations or for having made original contributions of major significance, as his citation count and recommendation letters did not sufficiently demonstrate a significant impact on the field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.