EB-1A Dismissed โ Computer Science (2018): did not establish he met at least three of the required
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that he met at least three of the required evidentiary criteria. While the Director acknowledged he met the criteria for judging the work of others and for scholarly articles, the AAO determined he did not prove his original contributions were of major significance to the field. The evidence, including citation counts and recommendation letters, did not establish that his work had a widespread impact or influence rising to the level of major significance.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.