EB-1A Dismissed — Computer Science (2021): did not establish he met at least three of the required
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that he met at least three of the required evidentiary criteria. While the Director and the AAO agreed that the petitioner satisfied the criteria for judging the work of others and authorship of scholarly articles, they found the evidence did not support his claim of having made original contributions of major significance to the field. The expert letters, while technically detailed, were deemed insufficient as they did not elaborate on the actual impact or widespread influence of the petitioner's work.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.