Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Conductive Polymer Engineering (2004): did not meet three criteria
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the required three criteria. The AAO concurred with the director that the petitioner's memberships did not require outstanding achievements and that articles citing his work were not 'about' him. Furthermore, the petitioner's evidence for original contributions, primarily reference letters from close associates, was deemed insufficient to prove major significance to the field as a whole or sustained acclaim.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Membership In Associations Published Materials About The Alien Original Scientific Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.