dismissed EB-1A Case: Culinary Arts

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave.. N.W., Km. A3042 
Washington. DC' 20529 
id- data meted lo 
prevent My unwarranted 
invaston of llersonal arivacv 
mwc copy 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
FILE: WAC 03 192 50834 Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: SEp J 0 
PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as an Alien of Extraordinary Ability Pursuant to 
Section 203(b)(I)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1153(b)(l)(A) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
SELF-REPRESENTED 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
4 Roben P. Wiemann, Director 
Administrative Appeals Office 
WAC 03 192 50834 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, California Service 
Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed. 
The petitioner seeks classification as an employment-based immigrant pursuant to section 203(b)(l)(A) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1153(b)(I)(A), as an alien of extraordinary ability in the 
culinary arts. The director determined that the petitioner had not established the sustained national or 
international acclaim requisite to classification as an alien of extraordinary ability. 
On Form I-290B the petitioner states, "My 1-140 Petition was denied on January 21, 2005. I strongly need 
appeal my 1-140 petition." The petitioner dated his appeal February 10, 2005 and indicated that he would 
submit a brief and/or additional evidence to the AAO within 30 days. As of this date, over seven months later, 
the AAO has received nothing further from the petitioner. 
As stated in 8 C.F.R. $ 103.3(a)(l)(v), an appeal shall be summrily dismissed if the party concerned fails to 
identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. In this case, the 
petitioner has identified no error of law or fact in the director's decision. The appeal must therefore be 
summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.