EB-1A Dismissed โ Data Science (2018): did not establish the beneficiary met at least three of the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary met at least three of the required evidentiary criteria. The AAO re-evaluated a criterion the Director had initially approved, 'original contributions of major significance,' and concluded the evidence was insufficient. The beneficiary's publications, media reports, and patent did not establish that his work had a major impact on the field, as much of the evidence pointed to potential future impact rather than recognized, sustained acclaim.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.