EB-1A Dismissed โ Dermatology (2013): did not establish eligibility under the requisite three
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate eligibility under the requisite three criteria for an alien of extraordinary ability. The petitioner only contested the director's negative finding on the 'original contributions' criterion, thereby abandoning other denied criteria. The AAO also withdrew the director's initial favorable finding on the 'awards' criterion, leaving the petitioner with insufficient evidence to establish sustained national or international acclaim.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.