Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Dermatology (2021): did not establish they met at least three of the required
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that they met at least three of the required evidentiary criteria. The AAO concurred with the Director that evidence for 'published material' was primarily promotional, untranslated, or authored by the petitioner, and that the evidence for 'original contributions' did not establish contributions of major significance to the field as a whole.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Published Material About The Petitioner Original Contributions Of Major Significance Authorship Of Scholarly Articles Display At Artistic Exhibitions Or Showcases Leading Or Critical Role High Remuneration Commercial Success In The Performing Arts
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.