Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Electrical Engineering (2023): the motion to reopen was dismissed because the petitioner
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen was dismissed because the petitioner did not provide sufficient new facts or evidence to overcome the previous denial. The AAO found the evidence for the claimed criteria, including awards, judging, and original contributions, was insufficient to demonstrate eligibility. New evidence for other criteria was not considered because it was not submitted in the initial proceeding, and was deemed insufficient regardless.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Awards Judging Original Contributions Membership Scholarly Articles Leading Or Critical Role High Salary
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.