EB-1A Dismissed โ Endodontics (2021): did not establish failed the final merits determination
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed the final merits determination. Although the Director found the petitioner met the minimum number of evidentiary criteria, the AAO concluded that the evidence, when considered in totality, did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim. The petitioner's committee positions were deemed local, her editorial board roles were not shown to be highly selective, and her highly-cited research was not recent enough to establish sustained influence in the field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.