EB-1A Dismissed โ Environmental And Chemical/Petroleum Engineering (2021): did not meet minimum of three evidentiary criteria
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the required minimum of three evidentiary criteria. While the petitioner met the criteria for authorship of scholarly articles and judging the work of others, the AAO concluded he did not establish that his original contributions were of major significance to the field. The evidence showed his research was a basis for comparison but did not establish that it stood out as particularly impactful or was widely adopted.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.