Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Fashion Design (2019): the motion to reopen a previously dismissed appeal was
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen a previously dismissed appeal was denied. The petitioner's new evidence for the 'published material' criterion was rejected because it was published after the petition's filing date or failed to establish the publications as 'major media'. Evidence for the 'high remuneration' criterion was also insufficient as it lacked comparative data to demonstrate the salary was significantly high relative to others in the field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Display Of Work At Artistic Exhibitions Or Showcases Leading Or Critical Role For Organizations With A Distinguished Reputation Published Material About The Alien High Salary Or Other Significantly High Remuneration
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.