EB-1A Dismissed โ Fencing (2015): did not meet the evidentiary requirements for an alien of
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the evidentiary requirements for an alien of extraordinary ability. The petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence of a major, internationally recognized award, nor did they meet at least three of the ten regulatory criteria. The AAO specifically noted that the petitioner failed to provide primary evidence for his claimed athletic awards, relying instead on secondary evidence like his CV and reference letters, which is insufficient.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.