Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Film Industry (2012): did not establish eligibility under at least three of the
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish eligibility under at least three of the required evidentiary criteria. The director determined the petitioner had not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim. Specifically, the AAO found that evidence submitted for the 'prizes or awards' criterion, such as press releases and articles, did not prove that the petitioner personally received the awards, but rather credited the film's director.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
8 C.F.R. § 204.5(H)(3)(I) 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(H)(3)(Iii) 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(H)(3)(V) 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(H)(3)(Vii) 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(H)(3)(X)
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.