EB-1A Dismissed โ Financial Research (2010): did not establish sustained national or international
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the director determined the petitioner did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim. The petitioner failed to meet the 'awards' criterion, as the doctoral travel award was considered related to academic study, not a prize for excellence in the professional field. The petitioner also failed the 'published material about the alien' criterion, as the evidence submitted consisted of citations to her work, not articles about her and her work as required by the regulation.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.