Dismissed
EB-1A
EB-1A Dismissed — Financial Technology (2024): did not meet number of evidentiary criteria
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the required number of evidentiary criteria. The AAO found that the petitioner's submitted article was not 'scholarly' in nature and that the evidence provided for high remuneration was insufficient because it could not be properly compared to the salary guides provided.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Judging The Work Of Others Published Materials About The Petitioner Authorship Of Scholarly Articles High Salary Or Remuneration
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.