EB-1A Dismissed โ Fuel Cell Research: did not meet the evidentiary requirements for the criteria
Filing your own EB-1A? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the evidentiary requirements for the criteria claimed. The petitioner's role as a co-primary investigator on a National Science Foundation grant was not considered a prize or award for excellence, but rather funding for research. Additionally, the petitioner did not prove that membership in his professional associations required outstanding achievement, and evidence of published material about his work was insufficient.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-1A petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-1A? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.